How to Increase the Readiness of Ukraine’s Industry to Smart Transformations

TitleHow to Increase the Readiness of Ukraine’s Industry to Smart Transformations
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuthorsVishnevsky, VP, Kniaziev, SI
Short TitleSci. innov.
SectionThe World of Innovations
Introduction. Accelerated development of the smart industry based on the use of modern cyber-physical technologies, is the worldwide dominant trend that will determine the competitive positions of national economies in the upcoming years. 
Problem Statement. Ukraine needs to improve its readiness for accelerated development of the smart industry (industry 4.0), insofar as its conventional industry undergoes a crisis, while the new smart industry has not yet received due attention from the government.
Purpose. To substantiate the measures for improving the readiness of the national industry for smart transformations in accordance with the current world trends in the development of cyber-physical production ecosystems.
Materials and Methods. Comparing the ratings of Ukraine, some other countries, and the world as a whole by the groups of indicators "institutions", "technologies," and "economy" characterizing the readiness of the industry for smart transformations.
Results. The industry of Ukraine has been established to retain, at least partially, its productive and innovative capabilities. The situation with the quality of basic economic institutions is more problematic. The toughest problems are a low overall level of the domestic economy development, and an unacceptable backlog in the development of R&D due to insufficient funding because of weak business demand for R&D products.
Conclusions. In the complex of measures to improve the readiness of Ukrainian industry for smart transformations, the greatest attention should be paid to increasing the business demand for R&D products. This requires transforming the short horizon of business planning, because of adverse influence of political cycle, to the long one by creating long-term development institutions based on the principles of independent regulatory agencies.
Keywordscyber-physical ecosystem, horizon of business planning, institution, R&D, smart industry
1. PwC. The long view: how will the global economic order change by 2050? PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2017. 72 p. 
2. Shvab, K. (2016). Chetvertaya promyishlennaya revolyutsiya. Moskow: Eksmo [in Russian].
3. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Bisson, P., Marrs, A. (2013). Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. McKinsey Global Institute.
4. Ellram, L., Tate, W., Petersen, K. (2013). Offshoring and Reshoring: An Up-date on the Manufacturing Location Decision. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 14—22.
5. International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities. Revision 4. (2008). New York: United Nations. 
6. Raynert, E. S. (2011). Kak bogatyie stranyi stali bogatyimi, i pochemu bednyie stranyi ostayutsya bednyimi. Moskow: Izd. dom Gos. un-ta – Vyisshey shkolyi ekonomiki [in Russian].
7. Smit, J., Kreutzer, S., Moeller, C., Carlberg, M. (2016). Industry 4.0. European Parliament. Directorate General for Internal Policies Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy. 
8. Report on the 5th Science and Technology Basic Plan. (2015). Council for Science, Technology and Innovation Cabinet Office? Government of Japan. 
9. Industrial Internet of Things: Unleashing the Potential of Connected Products and Services. (2015). Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. 
10. Daly, H. (2005). Economics in a full world. Scientific American. September, 100-107.
11. Brynjolfsson, E., McAfee, A., Spence, M. (2014). New World Order: Labor, Capital, and Ideas in the Power Law Economy. Foreign Affairs, 93(4), 1–14.
12. Jobs Lost, Jobs Gained: Workforce Transitions in a Time of Automation. (2017). McKinsey & Company. 
13. Lawrence, M., Roberts, C., King, L. (2017). Managing Automation Employment, Inequality and Ethics in the Digital Age. IPPR Commission on Economic Justice. Discussion Paper.
14. Kontseptsiia rozvytku tsyfrovoi ekonomiky ta suspilstva Ukrainy na 2018—2020 roky. Skhvaleno rozporiadzhenniam Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 17.01.2018 No. 67-r. 
URL: (Last accessed: 18.02.2018) [in Ukrainian].
15. Indeksy promyslovoi produktsii v Ukraini u 2007-2017 rokakh. 
URL: (Last accessed: 18.02.2018) [in Ukrainian].
16. Vishnevsky, V. P., Zbarazskaya, L. O. (2013). On the Issue of Concept of National Purpose-Oriented Program of Industrial Development of Ukraine. Economy of Industry, 1-2(61-62), 101—116 [in Russian].
17. Lebedeva, A. Kadrovyiy golod: pochemu v Ukraine ne hvataet kvalifitsirovannyih rabochih. 
18. Readiness for the Future of Production. Report 2018. Cologny/Geneva, Switzerland. World Economic Forum. 
19. Global Competitiveness Index 2017—2018. Competitiveness Rankings, 2017.  
20. Vishnevsky, V.P. (2016). Global Neoindustrialization and its Lessons for Ukraine. Economy of Ukraine, 8(649), 26–43 [in Russian].
21. Tsyfrova adzhenda Ukrainy – 2020 ("Tsyfrovyi poriadok dennyi" – 2020) Kontseptualni zasady (versiia 1.0) Pershocherhovi sfery, initsiatyvy, proekty "tsyfrovizatsii" Ukrainy do 2020 roku. Proekt. 
URL: (Last accessed: 18.02.2018) [in Ukrainian].
22. Action Agenda Smart Industry the Netherlands. 
23. World Bank. (2002). World Development Report 2002: Building Institutions for Markets. Moskow: Ves Mir.
24. Ganzienko, D. (2017). Kak budet rabotat Vyisshiy sud po voprosam intellektualnoy sobstvennosti i pochemu on tak vazhen. 
25. Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Securing the future of German manufacturing industry. Communication Promoters Group of the Industry-Science Research Alliance. Acatech – National Academy of Science and Engineering. 
26. Etalonnaya arhitektura. Glossariy EMS. Dell Technologies. 
27. Morgan, S. (2017). Cybersecurity Ventures predicts cybercrime damages will cost the world $6 trillion annually by 2021. Cybersecurity Ventures, 
28. World Development Indicators: Science and technology. The World Bank. 
URL: (Last accessed: 03.12.2017).
29. UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030. Second revised edition 2016. UNESCO Publishing. 
30. Spivakovskyi, O. (2017). Reforma nauky — osnova rozvytku derzhavy. Holos Ukrainy. 
URL: (Last accessed: 14.03.2018) [in Ukrainian].
31. Shapiro, М. (1997). The problems of independent agencies in the United States and the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 276–291.
32. Perez, C. (2009). Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics. № 20. The Other Canon Foundation, Norway, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn.